Mathematical Psychology

This project investigates mathematical psychology's historical and philosophical foundations to clarify its distinguishing characteristics and relationships to adjacent fields. Through gathering primary sources, histories, and interviews with researchers, author Prof. Colin Allen - University of Pittsburgh [1, 2, 3] and his students Osman Attah, Brendan Fleig-Goldstein, Mara McGuire, and Dzintra Ullis have identified three central questions:

What makes the use of mathematics in mathematical psychology reasonably effective, in contrast to other sciences like physics-inspired mathematical biology or symbolic cognitive science?
How does the mathematical approach in mathematical psychology differ from other branches of psychology, like psychophysics and psychometrics?
What is the appropriate relationship of mathematical psychology to cognitive science, given diverging perspectives on aligning with this field?

Preliminary findings emphasize data-driven modeling, skepticism of cognitive science alignments, and early reliance on computation. They will further probe the interplay with cognitive neuroscience and contrast rational-analysis approaches. By elucidating the motivating perspectives and objectives of different eras in mathematical psychology's development, they aim to understand its past and inform constructive dialogue on its philosophical foundations and future directions. This project intends to provide a conceptual roadmap for the field through integrated history and philosophy of science.

The Project: Integrating History and Philosophy of Mathematical Psychology

This project aims to integrate historical and philosophical perspectives to elucidate the foundations of mathematical psychology. As Norwood Hanson stated, history without philosophy is blind, while philosophy without history is empty. The goal is to find a middle ground between the contextual focus of history and the conceptual focus of philosophy.

The team acknowledges that all historical accounts are imperfect, but some can provide valuable insights. The history of mathematical psychology is difficult to tell without centering on the influential Stanford group. Tracing academic lineages and key events includes part of the picture, but more context is needed to fully understand the field's development.

The project draws on diverse sources, including research interviews, retrospective articles, formal histories, and online materials. More interviews and research will further flesh out the historical and philosophical foundations. While incomplete, the current analysis aims to identify important themes, contrasts, and questions that shaped mathematical psychology's evolution. Ultimately, the goal is an integrated historical and conceptual roadmap to inform contemporary perspectives on the field's identity and future directions.

The Rise of Mathematical Psychology

The history of efforts to mathematize psychology traces back to the quantitative imperative stemming from the Galilean scientific revolution. This imprinted the notion that proper science requires mathematics, leading to "physics envy" in other disciplines like psychology.

Many early psychologists argued psychology needed to become mathematical to be scientific. However, mathematizing psychology faced complications absent in the physical sciences. Objects in psychology were not readily present as quantifiable, provoking heated debates on whether psychometric and psychophysical measurements were meaningful.

Nonetheless, the desire to develop mathematical psychology persisted. Different approaches grappled with determining the appropriate role of mathematics in relation to psychological experiments and data. For example, Herbart favored starting with mathematics to ensure accuracy, while Fechner insisted experiments must come first to ground mathematics.

Tensions remain between data-driven versus theory-driven mathematization of psychology. Contemporary perspectives range from psychometric and psychophysical stances that foreground data to measurement-theoretical and computational approaches that emphasize formal models.

Elucidating how psychologists negotiated to apply mathematical methods to an apparently resistant subject matter helps reveal the evolving role and place of mathematics in psychology. This historical interplay shaped the emergence of mathematical psychology as a field.

The Distinctive Mathematical Approach of Mathematical Psychology

What sets mathematical psychology apart from other branches of psychology in its use of mathematics?

Several key aspects stand out:

Advocating quantitative methods broadly. Mathematical psychology emerged partly to push psychology to embrace quantitative modeling and mathematics beyond basic statistics.
Drawing from diverse mathematical tools. With greater training in mathematics, mathematical psychologists utilize more advanced and varied mathematical techniques like topology and differential geometry.
Linking models and experiments. Mathematical psychologists emphasize tightly connecting experimental design and statistical analysis, with experiments created to test specific models.
Favoring theoretical models. Mathematical psychology incorporates "pure" mathematical results and prefers analytic, hand-fitted models over data-driven computer models.
Seeking general, cumulative theory. Unlike just describing data, mathematical psychology aspires to abstract, general theory supported across experiments, cumulative progress in models, and mathematical insight into psychological mechanisms.

So while not unique to mathematical psychology, these key elements help characterize how its use of mathematics diverges from adjacent fields like psychophysics and psychometrics. Mathematical psychology carved out an identity embracing quantitative methods but also theoretical depth and broad generalization.

Situating Mathematical Psychology Relative to Cognitive Science

What is the appropriate perspective on mathematical psychology's relationship to cognitive psychology and cognitive science? While connected historically and conceptually, essential distinctions exist.

Mathematical psychology draws from diverse disciplines that are also influential in cognitive science, like computer science, psychology, linguistics, and neuroscience. However, mathematical psychology appears more skeptical of alignments with cognitive science.

For example, cognitive science prominently adopted the computer as a model of the human mind, while mathematical psychology focused more narrowly on computers as modeling tools.

Additionally, mathematical psychology seems to take a more critical stance towards purely simulation-based modeling in cognitive science, instead emphasizing iterative modeling tightly linked to experimentation.

Overall, mathematical psychology exhibits significant overlap with cognitive science but strongly asserts its distinct mathematical orientation and modeling perspectives. Elucidating this complex relationship remains an ongoing project, but preliminary analysis suggests mathematical psychology intentionally diverged from cognitive science in its formative development.

This establishes mathematical psychology's separate identity while retaining connections to adjacent disciplines at the intersection of mathematics, psychology, and computation.

Looking Ahead: Open Questions and Future Research

This historical and conceptual analysis of mathematical psychology's foundations has illuminated key themes, contrasts, and questions that shaped the field's development. Further research can build on these preliminary findings.

Additional work is needed to flesh out the fuller intellectual, social, and political context driving the evolution of mathematical psychology. Examining the influences and reactions of key figures will provide a richer picture.

Ongoing investigation can probe whether the identified tensions and contrasts represent historical artifacts or still animate contemporary debates. Do mathematical psychologists today grapple with similar questions on the role of mathematics and modeling?

Further analysis should also elucidate the nature of the purported bidirectional relationship between modeling and experimentation in mathematical psychology. As well, clarifying the diversity of perspectives on goals like generality, abstraction, and cumulative theory-building would be valuable.

Finally, this research aims to spur discussion on philosophical issues such as realism, pluralism, and progress in mathematical psychology models. Is the accuracy and truth value of models an important consideration or mainly beside the point? And where is the field headed - towards greater verisimilitude or an indefinite balancing of complexity and abstraction?

By spurring reflection on this conceptual foundation, this historical and integrative analysis hopes to provide a roadmap to inform constructive dialogue on mathematical psychology's identity and future trajectory.

The SDTEST^®

The SDTEST^® is a simple and fun tool to uncover our unique motivational values that use mathematical psychology of varying complexity.

The SDTEST^® helps us better understand ourselves and others on this lifelong path of self-discovery.

Here are reports of polls which SDTEST^® makes:

1) Ketso tsa lik'hamphani tse mabapi le basebetsi khoeling ea ho qetela (e / che)

2) Ketso tsa lik'hamphani tse mabapi le basebetsi khoeling ea ho qetela (e 'nete ea%)

3) Tšabo

4) Mathata a maholo a tobaneng le naha ea ka

5) Ke litšoaneleho life le bokhoni bo botle ba sebelisang litšobotsi le bokhoni bofe bo sebelisang ha ho aha lihlopha tse atlehileng?

6) Google. Lintlha tse amang sehlopha se sebetsang le sehlopha

7) Lintho tse ka sehloohong tse tlang pele

8) Ke eng e etsang mookameli e motle?

9) Ke eng e etsang hore batho ba atlehe mosebetsing?

10) Na u se u loketse ho fumana moputso o fokolang hore o sebetse hole?

11) Na Agesomm e teng?

12) Agesomm ea mosebetsi

13) Agerimphe bophelong

14) Lisosa tsa Age

15) Mabaka a etsang hore batho ba inehele (ke Anna ba bohlokoa)

16) Tšepa (#WVS)

17) Tlhahlobo ea thabo ea Oxford

18) Bophelo bo botle ba kelello

19) Monyetla o latelang o ne o tla ba kae?

20) U tla etsa eng bekeng ena ho hlokomela bophelo ba hau ba kelello?

21) Ke phela ka ho nahana ka nako e fetileng, ea hona joale kapa ea bokamoso

22) Meritocracy

23) Bohlale ba maiketsetso le pheletso ea tsoelo-pele

24) Hobaneng ha batho ba lieha?

25) Phapang ea bong ho aha boitšepo (IFD Allensbach)

26) Xing.com Tlhahlobo ea setso

27) Patrick Lecioli's "ho bapala tse hlano tsa sehlopha"

28) Kutloelo-bohloko ke ...

29) Ke eng ea bohlokoa bakeng sa eona e ikhethang ha u khetha tlhahiso ea mosebetsi?

30) Hobaneng ha batho ba hana liphetoho (ke Siobhán Mchale)

31) U laola maikutlo a hau joang? (ke Nawal MealAFA M.A.)

32) 21 Tsebo e lefang ka ho sa feleng (ka Jeremia Teo / 赵汉昇)

33) Tokoloho ea 'nete ke ...

34) Mekhoa e 12 ea ho aha ts'epo ea ho ts'epa

35) Litšobotsi tsa mohiruoa ea nang le talenta (ka instant actite ea Talenta)

36) 10 Litsela tsa ho susumetsa sehlopha sa hau

37) Algebra ea Letsoalo (ea Vladimir Lefebvre)

38) Menyetla e meraro e Ikhethang ea Bokamoso (ka Dr. Clare W. Graves)

39) Liketso tsa ho aha ho itšepa ho sa sisinyeheng (ka Suren Samarchyan)

40)

Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “Fears“. The full version of the results is available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.

Tšabo

lichate Correlation

VUCA

Mahlonoko tseo ho leng bohlokoa ba Correlation coefficient

Kabo e tloaelehileng, ke William Searly Gosset (seithuti) r = 0.0317

Kabo e tloaelehileng e sa tloaelehang, ka Spearman r = 0.0013

Bonts'a feela liphetho feela > r = 0.0317

TLHOKOMELISO	Se seng se tloaelehileng	Se seng se tloaelehileng	Se seng se tloaelehileng	Tloaelehileng	Tloaelehileng	Tloaelehileng	Tloaelehileng	Tloaelehileng
Lipotso tsohle Lipotso tsohle Tšabo ea ka e kholo ke
Tšabo ea ka e kholo ke
Answer 1	-	Fokolang positive 0.0540	Fokolang positive 0.0288	Fokolang mpe -0.0178	Fokolang positive 0.0946	Fokolang positive 0.0383	Fokolang mpe -0.0180	Fokolang mpe -0.1561
Answer 2	-	Fokolang positive 0.0198	Fokolang mpe -0.0049	Fokolang mpe -0.0389	Fokolang positive 0.0652	Fokolang positive 0.0497	Fokolang positive 0.0103	Fokolang mpe -0.0978
Answer 3	-	Fokolang mpe -0.0003	Fokolang mpe -0.0082	Fokolang mpe -0.0451	Fokolang mpe -0.0442	Fokolang positive 0.0484	Fokolang positive 0.0743	Fokolang mpe -0.0207
Answer 4	-	Fokolang positive 0.0437	Fokolang positive 0.0290	Fokolang mpe -0.0235	Fokolang positive 0.0160	Fokolang positive 0.0370	Fokolang positive 0.0223	Fokolang mpe -0.0992
Answer 5	-	Fokolang positive 0.0274	Fokolang positive 0.1292	Fokolang positive 0.0110	Fokolang positive 0.0748	Fokolang positive 0.0010	Fokolang mpe -0.0175	Fokolang mpe -0.1786
Answer 6	-	Fokolang mpe -0.0017	Fokolang positive 0.0059	Fokolang mpe -0.0609	Fokolang mpe -0.0092	Fokolang positive 0.0254	Fokolang positive 0.0845	Fokolang mpe -0.0363
Answer 7	-	Fokolang positive 0.0111	Fokolang positive 0.0349	Fokolang mpe -0.0659	Fokolang mpe -0.0303	Fokolang positive 0.0520	Fokolang positive 0.0687	Fokolang mpe -0.0532
Answer 8	-	Fokolang positive 0.0655	Fokolang positive 0.0730	Fokolang mpe -0.0260	Fokolang positive 0.0126	Fokolang positive 0.0386	Fokolang positive 0.0154	Fokolang mpe -0.1344
Answer 9	-	Fokolang positive 0.0757	Fokolang positive 0.1606	Fokolang positive 0.0062	Fokolang positive 0.0614	Fokolang mpe -0.0064	Fokolang mpe -0.0492	Fokolang mpe -0.1821
Answer 10	-	Fokolang positive 0.0763	Fokolang positive 0.0671	Fokolang mpe -0.0129	Fokolang positive 0.0273	Fokolang positive 0.0364	Fokolang mpe -0.0130	Fokolang mpe -0.1347
Answer 11	-	Fokolang positive 0.0633	Fokolang positive 0.0527	Fokolang mpe -0.0080	Fokolang positive 0.0098	Fokolang positive 0.0264	Fokolang positive 0.0242	Fokolang mpe -0.1269
Answer 12	-	Fokolang positive 0.0448	Fokolang positive 0.0944	Fokolang mpe -0.0323	Fokolang positive 0.0310	Fokolang positive 0.0341	Fokolang positive 0.0261	Fokolang mpe -0.1532
Answer 13	-	Fokolang positive 0.0723	Fokolang positive 0.0947	Fokolang mpe -0.0385	Fokolang positive 0.0267	Fokolang positive 0.0442	Fokolang positive 0.0146	Fokolang mpe -0.1636
Answer 14	-	Fokolang positive 0.0819	Fokolang positive 0.0899	Fokolang mpe -0.0035	Fokolang mpe -0.0120	Fokolang positive 0.0060	Fokolang positive 0.0136	Fokolang mpe -0.1212
Answer 15	-	Fokolang positive 0.0548	Fokolang positive 0.1267	Fokolang mpe -0.0338	Fokolang positive 0.0121	Fokolang mpe -0.0153	Fokolang positive 0.0243	Fokolang mpe -0.1155
Answer 16	-	Fokolang positive 0.0731	Fokolang positive 0.0243	Fokolang mpe -0.0375	Fokolang mpe -0.0397	Fokolang positive 0.0729	Fokolang positive 0.0170	Fokolang mpe -0.0774

Export ho MS ipabola

Ts'ebetso ena e tla fumaneha likhethong tsa hau tsa VUCA

You can not only just create your poll in the ditefiso «V.U.C.A phuputsong moqapi» (with a unique link and your logo) but also you can earn money by selling its results in the ditefiso «Lebenkele la Poll», as already the authors of polls.

If you participated in VUCA polls, you can see your results and compare them with the overall polls results, which are constantly growing, in your personal account after purchasing ditefiso «My SDT»

[1] https://twitter.com/wileyprof

[2] https://colinallen.dnsalias.org

[3] https://philpeople.org/profiles/colin-allen

2023.10.13

Valerii Kosenko

Mong'a Sehlahisoa SaaS SDTEST®

Valerii o ile a tšoaneleha ho ba setsebi sa thuto ea kelello sechabeng ka 1993, 'me haesale a sebelisa tsebo ea hae tsamaisong ea merero.
Valerii o ile a fumana lengolo la Master le lengolo la thuto le mookameli oa lenaneo ka 2013. Nakong ea lenaneo la Master, o ile a tloaelana le Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) le Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii ke sengoli sa ho hlahloba ho se kholisehe ha V.U.C.A. mohopolo o sebelisang Spiral Dynamics le lipalopalo tsa lipalo ho psychology, le likhetho tse 38 tsa machaba.

Poso ena e na le 0 Maikutlo

Karabo ho

Hlakola karabo

Tlohela maikutlo a hau