Mathematical Psychology

This project investigates mathematical psychology's historical and philosophical foundations to clarify its distinguishing characteristics and relationships to adjacent fields. Through gathering primary sources, histories, and interviews with researchers, author Prof. Colin Allen - University of Pittsburgh [1, 2, 3] and his students Osman Attah, Brendan Fleig-Goldstein, Mara McGuire, and Dzintra Ullis have identified three central questions:

What makes the use of mathematics in mathematical psychology reasonably effective, in contrast to other sciences like physics-inspired mathematical biology or symbolic cognitive science?
How does the mathematical approach in mathematical psychology differ from other branches of psychology, like psychophysics and psychometrics?
What is the appropriate relationship of mathematical psychology to cognitive science, given diverging perspectives on aligning with this field?

Preliminary findings emphasize data-driven modeling, skepticism of cognitive science alignments, and early reliance on computation. They will further probe the interplay with cognitive neuroscience and contrast rational-analysis approaches. By elucidating the motivating perspectives and objectives of different eras in mathematical psychology's development, they aim to understand its past and inform constructive dialogue on its philosophical foundations and future directions. This project intends to provide a conceptual roadmap for the field through integrated history and philosophy of science.

The Project: Integrating History and Philosophy of Mathematical Psychology

This project aims to integrate historical and philosophical perspectives to elucidate the foundations of mathematical psychology. As Norwood Hanson stated, history without philosophy is blind, while philosophy without history is empty. The goal is to find a middle ground between the contextual focus of history and the conceptual focus of philosophy.

The team acknowledges that all historical accounts are imperfect, but some can provide valuable insights. The history of mathematical psychology is difficult to tell without centering on the influential Stanford group. Tracing academic lineages and key events includes part of the picture, but more context is needed to fully understand the field's development.

The project draws on diverse sources, including research interviews, retrospective articles, formal histories, and online materials. More interviews and research will further flesh out the historical and philosophical foundations. While incomplete, the current analysis aims to identify important themes, contrasts, and questions that shaped mathematical psychology's evolution. Ultimately, the goal is an integrated historical and conceptual roadmap to inform contemporary perspectives on the field's identity and future directions.

The Rise of Mathematical Psychology

The history of efforts to mathematize psychology traces back to the quantitative imperative stemming from the Galilean scientific revolution. This imprinted the notion that proper science requires mathematics, leading to "physics envy" in other disciplines like psychology.

Many early psychologists argued psychology needed to become mathematical to be scientific. However, mathematizing psychology faced complications absent in the physical sciences. Objects in psychology were not readily present as quantifiable, provoking heated debates on whether psychometric and psychophysical measurements were meaningful.

Nonetheless, the desire to develop mathematical psychology persisted. Different approaches grappled with determining the appropriate role of mathematics in relation to psychological experiments and data. For example, Herbart favored starting with mathematics to ensure accuracy, while Fechner insisted experiments must come first to ground mathematics.

Tensions remain between data-driven versus theory-driven mathematization of psychology. Contemporary perspectives range from psychometric and psychophysical stances that foreground data to measurement-theoretical and computational approaches that emphasize formal models.

Elucidating how psychologists negotiated to apply mathematical methods to an apparently resistant subject matter helps reveal the evolving role and place of mathematics in psychology. This historical interplay shaped the emergence of mathematical psychology as a field.

The Distinctive Mathematical Approach of Mathematical Psychology

What sets mathematical psychology apart from other branches of psychology in its use of mathematics?

Several key aspects stand out:

Advocating quantitative methods broadly. Mathematical psychology emerged partly to push psychology to embrace quantitative modeling and mathematics beyond basic statistics.
Drawing from diverse mathematical tools. With greater training in mathematics, mathematical psychologists utilize more advanced and varied mathematical techniques like topology and differential geometry.
Linking models and experiments. Mathematical psychologists emphasize tightly connecting experimental design and statistical analysis, with experiments created to test specific models.
Favoring theoretical models. Mathematical psychology incorporates "pure" mathematical results and prefers analytic, hand-fitted models over data-driven computer models.
Seeking general, cumulative theory. Unlike just describing data, mathematical psychology aspires to abstract, general theory supported across experiments, cumulative progress in models, and mathematical insight into psychological mechanisms.

So while not unique to mathematical psychology, these key elements help characterize how its use of mathematics diverges from adjacent fields like psychophysics and psychometrics. Mathematical psychology carved out an identity embracing quantitative methods but also theoretical depth and broad generalization.

Situating Mathematical Psychology Relative to Cognitive Science

What is the appropriate perspective on mathematical psychology's relationship to cognitive psychology and cognitive science? While connected historically and conceptually, essential distinctions exist.

Mathematical psychology draws from diverse disciplines that are also influential in cognitive science, like computer science, psychology, linguistics, and neuroscience. However, mathematical psychology appears more skeptical of alignments with cognitive science.

For example, cognitive science prominently adopted the computer as a model of the human mind, while mathematical psychology focused more narrowly on computers as modeling tools.

Additionally, mathematical psychology seems to take a more critical stance towards purely simulation-based modeling in cognitive science, instead emphasizing iterative modeling tightly linked to experimentation.

Overall, mathematical psychology exhibits significant overlap with cognitive science but strongly asserts its distinct mathematical orientation and modeling perspectives. Elucidating this complex relationship remains an ongoing project, but preliminary analysis suggests mathematical psychology intentionally diverged from cognitive science in its formative development.

This establishes mathematical psychology's separate identity while retaining connections to adjacent disciplines at the intersection of mathematics, psychology, and computation.

Looking Ahead: Open Questions and Future Research

This historical and conceptual analysis of mathematical psychology's foundations has illuminated key themes, contrasts, and questions that shaped the field's development. Further research can build on these preliminary findings.

Additional work is needed to flesh out the fuller intellectual, social, and political context driving the evolution of mathematical psychology. Examining the influences and reactions of key figures will provide a richer picture.

Ongoing investigation can probe whether the identified tensions and contrasts represent historical artifacts or still animate contemporary debates. Do mathematical psychologists today grapple with similar questions on the role of mathematics and modeling?

Further analysis should also elucidate the nature of the purported bidirectional relationship between modeling and experimentation in mathematical psychology. As well, clarifying the diversity of perspectives on goals like generality, abstraction, and cumulative theory-building would be valuable.

Finally, this research aims to spur discussion on philosophical issues such as realism, pluralism, and progress in mathematical psychology models. Is the accuracy and truth value of models an important consideration or mainly beside the point? And where is the field headed - towards greater verisimilitude or an indefinite balancing of complexity and abstraction?

By spurring reflection on this conceptual foundation, this historical and integrative analysis hopes to provide a roadmap to inform constructive dialogue on mathematical psychology's identity and future trajectory.

The SDTEST^®

The SDTEST^® is a simple and fun tool to uncover our unique motivational values that use mathematical psychology of varying complexity.

The SDTEST^® helps us better understand ourselves and others on this lifelong path of self-discovery.

Here are reports of polls which SDTEST^® makes:

1) Nga mahi a nga kamupene e pa ana ki nga kaimahi i te marama kua hipa (ae / kaore)

2) Nga mahi a nga kamupene e pa ana ki nga kaimahi i te marama whakamutunga (meka i te%)

3) Mataku

4) Nga raru nui e anga atu ana ki taku whenua

5) He aha nga kounga me nga kaha e whakamahia ana e nga rangatira i te wa e mahi ana nga ropu angitu?

6) Google. Āhuatanga e whai kiko ana te roopu roopu

7) Nga kaupapa matua o nga kaiwhaiwhai mahi

8) He aha te mea e tino rangatira ana te rangatira?

9) He aha te mea e angitu ai te tangata ki te mahi?

10) Kua rite koe ki te tango i te utu iti ake ki te mahi mamao?

11) Kei te mau tonu te kaupapa?

12) Ko te kaupapa i roto i te mahi

13) Nga mea nui i roto i te koiora

14) Tuhinga o mua

15) Te take he aha te take o te iwi (na Anna Fital)

16) Whakapono (#WVS)

17) Oxford te koa o te rangahau

18) Te oranga hinengaro

19) Kei hea koe e whai waahi pai rawa atu?

20) Ka aha koe i tenei wiki ki te tirotiro i to hauora hinengaro?

21) Kei te ora ahau mo te whakaaro mo aku mua, o mua me te heke mai ranei

22) Merirotocicy

23) Te mohio mohio me te mutunga o te ao

24) He aha te iwi e tuku ai?

25) Te rereketanga o te ira tangata ki te hanga i te maia-whaiaro (Ifd Allensbach)

26) Xing.com Te Aromatawai Ahuwhenua

27) Ko Patrick Lencioni's "nga kohinga e rima o te roopu"

28) Ko te ngakau nui ...

29) He aha te mea nui mo te mea motuhake ki te whiriwhiri i tetahi tuku mahi?

30) He aha te tangata e whakahē i te whakarereke (na Siobhán Mchale)

31) Me pehea e whakariterite ai i o kare? (Na Nawal Mustafa M.A.)

32) 21 Nga pukenga e utua ana e koe ake ake (na Jeremiah Teo / 赵汉昇)

33) Ko te tino rangatiratanga ko ...

34) 12 nga huarahi hei hanga i te whakawhirinaki ki etahi atu (na Justin Wright)

35) Nga ahuatanga o te kaimahi mohio (na te taranata whakahaere i te roopu whakahaere)

36) 10 taviri hei akiaki i to roopu

37) Algebra of Conscience (na Vladimir Lefebvre)

38) E toru nga mea rereke mo te heke mai (na Takuta Clare W. Graves)

Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “Fears“. The full version of the results is available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.

Mataku

Ngā tūtohi Ine

VUCA

uara Critical o te whakarea te faatanoraa

Tohatoha noa, na William Sealy Gospes (akonga) r = 0.033

Ko te tohatoha noa, na te taote r = 0.0013

Whakaatuhia anake nga hua > r = 0.033

Whakaratonga	Kore noa	Kore noa	Kore noa	Tonu	Tonu	Tonu	Tonu	Tonu
Nga paatai katoa Nga paatai katoa Ko taku wehi nui ko
Ko taku wehi nui ko
Answer 1	-	Pai ngoikore 0.0559	Pai ngoikore 0.0315	Negative ngoikore -0.0170	Pai ngoikore 0.0920	Pai ngoikore 0.0294	Negative ngoikore -0.0124	Negative ngoikore -0.1539
Answer 2	-	Pai ngoikore 0.0229	Negative ngoikore -0.0002	Negative ngoikore -0.0448	Pai ngoikore 0.0636	Pai ngoikore 0.0445	Pai ngoikore 0.0134	Negative ngoikore -0.0939
Answer 3	-	Negative ngoikore -0.0032	Negative ngoikore -0.0121	Negative ngoikore -0.0416	Negative ngoikore -0.0462	Pai ngoikore 0.0466	Pai ngoikore 0.0788	Negative ngoikore -0.0195
Answer 4	-	Pai ngoikore 0.0438	Pai ngoikore 0.0348	Negative ngoikore -0.0195	Pai ngoikore 0.0153	Pai ngoikore 0.0300	Pai ngoikore 0.0207	Negative ngoikore -0.0980
Answer 5	-	Pai ngoikore 0.0304	Pai ngoikore 0.1282	Pai ngoikore 0.0135	Pai ngoikore 0.0734	Negative ngoikore -0.0013	Negative ngoikore -0.0200	Negative ngoikore -0.1757
Answer 6	-	Negative ngoikore -0.0002	Pai ngoikore 0.0082	Negative ngoikore -0.0627	Negative ngoikore -0.0083	Pai ngoikore 0.0193	Pai ngoikore 0.0831	Negative ngoikore -0.0315
Answer 7	-	Pai ngoikore 0.0126	Pai ngoikore 0.0381	Negative ngoikore -0.0687	Negative ngoikore -0.0243	Pai ngoikore 0.0469	Pai ngoikore 0.0642	Negative ngoikore -0.0515
Answer 8	-	Pai ngoikore 0.0698	Pai ngoikore 0.0848	Negative ngoikore -0.0327	Pai ngoikore 0.0148	Pai ngoikore 0.0345	Pai ngoikore 0.0134	Negative ngoikore -0.1365
Answer 9	-	Pai ngoikore 0.0668	Pai ngoikore 0.1676	Pai ngoikore 0.0083	Pai ngoikore 0.0693	Negative ngoikore -0.0131	Negative ngoikore -0.0516	Negative ngoikore -0.1818
Answer 10	-	Pai ngoikore 0.0782	Pai ngoikore 0.0753	Negative ngoikore -0.0204	Pai ngoikore 0.0247	Pai ngoikore 0.0342	Negative ngoikore -0.0131	Negative ngoikore -0.1304
Answer 11	-	Pai ngoikore 0.0578	Pai ngoikore 0.0532	Negative ngoikore -0.0096	Pai ngoikore 0.0087	Pai ngoikore 0.0195	Pai ngoikore 0.0311	Negative ngoikore -0.1196
Answer 12	-	Pai ngoikore 0.0390	Pai ngoikore 0.1037	Negative ngoikore -0.0358	Pai ngoikore 0.0358	Pai ngoikore 0.0250	Pai ngoikore 0.0299	Negative ngoikore -0.1520
Answer 13	-	Pai ngoikore 0.0644	Pai ngoikore 0.1048	Negative ngoikore -0.0448	Pai ngoikore 0.0268	Pai ngoikore 0.0417	Pai ngoikore 0.0178	Negative ngoikore -0.1600
Answer 14	-	Pai ngoikore 0.0712	Pai ngoikore 0.1021	Negative ngoikore -0.0007	Negative ngoikore -0.0088	Negative ngoikore -0.0011	Pai ngoikore 0.0088	Negative ngoikore -0.1169
Answer 15	-	Pai ngoikore 0.0557	Pai ngoikore 0.1365	Negative ngoikore -0.0423	Pai ngoikore 0.0177	Negative ngoikore -0.0162	Pai ngoikore 0.0224	Negative ngoikore -0.1179
Answer 16	-	Pai ngoikore 0.0591	Pai ngoikore 0.0273	Negative ngoikore -0.0386	Negative ngoikore -0.0400	Pai ngoikore 0.0653	Pai ngoikore 0.0284	Negative ngoikore -0.0708

Kaweake ki MS Excel

Ka waatea tenei mahinga i roto i o ake ake pooti VUCA

You can not only just create your poll in the mua «V.U.C.A kaihoahoa pane» (with a unique link and your logo) but also you can earn money by selling its results in the mua «Toa pooti», as already the authors of polls.

If you participated in VUCA polls, you can see your results and compare them with the overall polls results, which are constantly growing, in your personal account after purchasing mua «Toku SDT»

[1] https://twitter.com/wileyprof

[2] https://colinallen.dnsalias.org

[3] https://philpeople.org/profiles/colin-allen

2023.10.13

Valerii Kosenko

Kaipupuri Hua Saas Pet Project SDtest®

Ko Valerii te tohu he kaupapa hinengaro-hinengaro-a-iwi i te tau 1993, mai i te mea kua paahitia tona matauranga ki te whakahaere kaupapa.
I whiwhi a Valerii i te tohu a te rangatira me te kaupapa me te Kaiwhakahaere Kaupapa Kaupapa i te tau 2013. I te wa e mohio ana ia ki te kaupapa o tona rangatira (GPM deutsche geselschaft f.
I mau a Valeyii i nga whakamatautau o te shomics spiro me te whakamahi i tona mohiotanga me tana wheako ki te whakariterite i te putanga o te SDtest.
Ko Valeyi te kaituhi o te torotoro i te koretake o te V.U.C.A. Te ariā ma te whakamahi i nga hihiri a te spiro me nga tatauranga pāngarau i roto i te hinengaro hinengaro, neke atu i te 20 nga pooti o te ao.

Kei roto i tenei pou 0 Tuhinga

Whakautu ki

Whakakorehia he whakautu

Waiho to korero