Mathematical Psychology

This project investigates mathematical psychology's historical and philosophical foundations to clarify its distinguishing characteristics and relationships to adjacent fields. Through gathering primary sources, histories, and interviews with researchers, author Prof. Colin Allen - University of Pittsburgh [1, 2, 3] and his students Osman Attah, Brendan Fleig-Goldstein, Mara McGuire, and Dzintra Ullis have identified three central questions:

What makes the use of mathematics in mathematical psychology reasonably effective, in contrast to other sciences like physics-inspired mathematical biology or symbolic cognitive science?
How does the mathematical approach in mathematical psychology differ from other branches of psychology, like psychophysics and psychometrics?
What is the appropriate relationship of mathematical psychology to cognitive science, given diverging perspectives on aligning with this field?

Preliminary findings emphasize data-driven modeling, skepticism of cognitive science alignments, and early reliance on computation. They will further probe the interplay with cognitive neuroscience and contrast rational-analysis approaches. By elucidating the motivating perspectives and objectives of different eras in mathematical psychology's development, they aim to understand its past and inform constructive dialogue on its philosophical foundations and future directions. This project intends to provide a conceptual roadmap for the field through integrated history and philosophy of science.

The Project: Integrating History and Philosophy of Mathematical Psychology

This project aims to integrate historical and philosophical perspectives to elucidate the foundations of mathematical psychology. As Norwood Hanson stated, history without philosophy is blind, while philosophy without history is empty. The goal is to find a middle ground between the contextual focus of history and the conceptual focus of philosophy.

The team acknowledges that all historical accounts are imperfect, but some can provide valuable insights. The history of mathematical psychology is difficult to tell without centering on the influential Stanford group. Tracing academic lineages and key events includes part of the picture, but more context is needed to fully understand the field's development.

The project draws on diverse sources, including research interviews, retrospective articles, formal histories, and online materials. More interviews and research will further flesh out the historical and philosophical foundations. While incomplete, the current analysis aims to identify important themes, contrasts, and questions that shaped mathematical psychology's evolution. Ultimately, the goal is an integrated historical and conceptual roadmap to inform contemporary perspectives on the field's identity and future directions.

The Rise of Mathematical Psychology

The history of efforts to mathematize psychology traces back to the quantitative imperative stemming from the Galilean scientific revolution. This imprinted the notion that proper science requires mathematics, leading to "physics envy" in other disciplines like psychology.

Many early psychologists argued psychology needed to become mathematical to be scientific. However, mathematizing psychology faced complications absent in the physical sciences. Objects in psychology were not readily present as quantifiable, provoking heated debates on whether psychometric and psychophysical measurements were meaningful.

Nonetheless, the desire to develop mathematical psychology persisted. Different approaches grappled with determining the appropriate role of mathematics in relation to psychological experiments and data. For example, Herbart favored starting with mathematics to ensure accuracy, while Fechner insisted experiments must come first to ground mathematics.

Tensions remain between data-driven versus theory-driven mathematization of psychology. Contemporary perspectives range from psychometric and psychophysical stances that foreground data to measurement-theoretical and computational approaches that emphasize formal models.

Elucidating how psychologists negotiated to apply mathematical methods to an apparently resistant subject matter helps reveal the evolving role and place of mathematics in psychology. This historical interplay shaped the emergence of mathematical psychology as a field.

The Distinctive Mathematical Approach of Mathematical Psychology

What sets mathematical psychology apart from other branches of psychology in its use of mathematics?

Several key aspects stand out:

Advocating quantitative methods broadly. Mathematical psychology emerged partly to push psychology to embrace quantitative modeling and mathematics beyond basic statistics.
Drawing from diverse mathematical tools. With greater training in mathematics, mathematical psychologists utilize more advanced and varied mathematical techniques like topology and differential geometry.
Linking models and experiments. Mathematical psychologists emphasize tightly connecting experimental design and statistical analysis, with experiments created to test specific models.
Favoring theoretical models. Mathematical psychology incorporates "pure" mathematical results and prefers analytic, hand-fitted models over data-driven computer models.
Seeking general, cumulative theory. Unlike just describing data, mathematical psychology aspires to abstract, general theory supported across experiments, cumulative progress in models, and mathematical insight into psychological mechanisms.

So while not unique to mathematical psychology, these key elements help characterize how its use of mathematics diverges from adjacent fields like psychophysics and psychometrics. Mathematical psychology carved out an identity embracing quantitative methods but also theoretical depth and broad generalization.

Situating Mathematical Psychology Relative to Cognitive Science

What is the appropriate perspective on mathematical psychology's relationship to cognitive psychology and cognitive science? While connected historically and conceptually, essential distinctions exist.

Mathematical psychology draws from diverse disciplines that are also influential in cognitive science, like computer science, psychology, linguistics, and neuroscience. However, mathematical psychology appears more skeptical of alignments with cognitive science.

For example, cognitive science prominently adopted the computer as a model of the human mind, while mathematical psychology focused more narrowly on computers as modeling tools.

Additionally, mathematical psychology seems to take a more critical stance towards purely simulation-based modeling in cognitive science, instead emphasizing iterative modeling tightly linked to experimentation.

Overall, mathematical psychology exhibits significant overlap with cognitive science but strongly asserts its distinct mathematical orientation and modeling perspectives. Elucidating this complex relationship remains an ongoing project, but preliminary analysis suggests mathematical psychology intentionally diverged from cognitive science in its formative development.

This establishes mathematical psychology's separate identity while retaining connections to adjacent disciplines at the intersection of mathematics, psychology, and computation.

Looking Ahead: Open Questions and Future Research

This historical and conceptual analysis of mathematical psychology's foundations has illuminated key themes, contrasts, and questions that shaped the field's development. Further research can build on these preliminary findings.

Additional work is needed to flesh out the fuller intellectual, social, and political context driving the evolution of mathematical psychology. Examining the influences and reactions of key figures will provide a richer picture.

Ongoing investigation can probe whether the identified tensions and contrasts represent historical artifacts or still animate contemporary debates. Do mathematical psychologists today grapple with similar questions on the role of mathematics and modeling?

Further analysis should also elucidate the nature of the purported bidirectional relationship between modeling and experimentation in mathematical psychology. As well, clarifying the diversity of perspectives on goals like generality, abstraction, and cumulative theory-building would be valuable.

Finally, this research aims to spur discussion on philosophical issues such as realism, pluralism, and progress in mathematical psychology models. Is the accuracy and truth value of models an important consideration or mainly beside the point? And where is the field headed - towards greater verisimilitude or an indefinite balancing of complexity and abstraction?

By spurring reflection on this conceptual foundation, this historical and integrative analysis hopes to provide a roadmap to inform constructive dialogue on mathematical psychology's identity and future trajectory.

The SDTEST^®

The SDTEST^® is a simple and fun tool to uncover our unique motivational values that use mathematical psychology of varying complexity.

The SDTEST^® helps us better understand ourselves and others on this lifelong path of self-discovery.

Here are reports of polls which SDTEST^® makes:

1) Aðgerðir fyrirtækja í tengslum við starfsfólk í síðasta mánuði (já / nei)

2) Aðgerðir fyrirtækja í tengslum við starfsfólk í síðasta mánuði (staðreynd í%)

3) Ótta.

4) Stærstu vandamálin standa frammi fyrir mínu landi

5) Hvaða eiginleikar og hæfileikar nota góðir leiðtogar þegar þeir byggja árangursrík teymi?

6) Google. Þættir sem hafa áhrif á teymisáhrif

7) Helstu forgangsröðun atvinnuleitenda

8) Hvað gerir yfirmann að frábærum leiðtoga?

9) Hvað gerir fólk farsælt í vinnunni?

10) Ertu tilbúinn að fá minni laun til að vinna lítillega?

11) Er aldurshyggja til?

12) Aldurshyggja á ferli

13) Aldurshyggja í lífinu

14) Orsakir aldurshyggju

15) Ástæður þess að fólk gefst upp (eftir Anna Vital)

16) Traust (#WVS)

17) Hamingjukönnun Oxford

18) Sálfræðileg vellíðan

19) Hvar væri næsta spennandi tækifæri þitt?

20) Hvað ætlar þú að gera þessa vikuna til að sjá um geðheilsu þína?

21) Ég lifi að hugsa um fortíð mína, nútíð eða framtíð

22) Meritocracy

23) Gervigreind og lok siðmenningarinnar

24) Af hverju frestast fólk?

25) Kynjamunur á að byggja upp sjálfstraust (IFD Allensbach)

26) Xing.com menningarmat

27) Patrick Lencioni „Fimm truflanir liðs“

28) Samkennd er ...

29) Hvað er mikilvægt fyrir það sérfræðinga í því að velja atvinnutilboð?

30) Af hverju fólk standast breytingar (eftir Siobhán McHale)

31) Hvernig stjórnarðu tilfinningum þínum? (eftir Nawal Mustafa M.A.)

32) 21 Færni sem borgar þér að eilífu (eftir Jeremiah Teo / 赵汉昇)

33) Raunverulegt frelsi er ...

34) 12 leiðir til að byggja upp traust með öðrum (eftir Justin Wright)

35) Einkenni hæfileikaríks starfsmanns (eftir hæfileikastjórnunarstofnun)

36) 10 lyklar til að hvetja liðið þitt

37) Algebra samviskunnar (eftir Vladimir Lefebvre)

38) Þrír aðskildir möguleikar framtíðarinnar (eftir Dr. Clare W. Graves)

Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “Fears“. The full version of the results is available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.

Ótta.

Töflur Fylgni

VUCA

Critical gildi fylgnistuðull

Venjuleg dreifing, eftir William Sealy Gosset (námsmaður) r = 0.033

Ekki venjuleg dreifing, eftir Spearman r = 0.0013

Sýna aðeins niðurstöður > r = 0.033

Dreifing	Ekki eðlilegt	Ekki eðlilegt	Ekki eðlilegt	Venjulegt	Venjulegt	Venjulegt	Venjulegt	Venjulegt
Allar spurningar Allar spurningar Mesta ótta mín er
Mesta ótta mín er
Answer 1	-	Veikt jákvætt 0.0559	Veikt jákvætt 0.0315	Veikt neikvætt -0.0170	Veikt jákvætt 0.0920	Veikt jákvætt 0.0294	Veikt neikvætt -0.0124	Veikt neikvætt -0.1539
Answer 2	-	Veikt jákvætt 0.0229	Veikt neikvætt -0.0002	Veikt neikvætt -0.0448	Veikt jákvætt 0.0636	Veikt jákvætt 0.0445	Veikt jákvætt 0.0134	Veikt neikvætt -0.0939
Answer 3	-	Veikt neikvætt -0.0032	Veikt neikvætt -0.0121	Veikt neikvætt -0.0416	Veikt neikvætt -0.0462	Veikt jákvætt 0.0466	Veikt jákvætt 0.0788	Veikt neikvætt -0.0195
Answer 4	-	Veikt jákvætt 0.0438	Veikt jákvætt 0.0348	Veikt neikvætt -0.0195	Veikt jákvætt 0.0153	Veikt jákvætt 0.0300	Veikt jákvætt 0.0207	Veikt neikvætt -0.0980
Answer 5	-	Veikt jákvætt 0.0304	Veikt jákvætt 0.1282	Veikt jákvætt 0.0135	Veikt jákvætt 0.0734	Veikt neikvætt -0.0013	Veikt neikvætt -0.0200	Veikt neikvætt -0.1757
Answer 6	-	Veikt neikvætt -0.0002	Veikt jákvætt 0.0082	Veikt neikvætt -0.0627	Veikt neikvætt -0.0083	Veikt jákvætt 0.0193	Veikt jákvætt 0.0831	Veikt neikvætt -0.0315
Answer 7	-	Veikt jákvætt 0.0126	Veikt jákvætt 0.0381	Veikt neikvætt -0.0687	Veikt neikvætt -0.0243	Veikt jákvætt 0.0469	Veikt jákvætt 0.0642	Veikt neikvætt -0.0515
Answer 8	-	Veikt jákvætt 0.0698	Veikt jákvætt 0.0848	Veikt neikvætt -0.0327	Veikt jákvætt 0.0148	Veikt jákvætt 0.0345	Veikt jákvætt 0.0134	Veikt neikvætt -0.1365
Answer 9	-	Veikt jákvætt 0.0668	Veikt jákvætt 0.1676	Veikt jákvætt 0.0083	Veikt jákvætt 0.0693	Veikt neikvætt -0.0131	Veikt neikvætt -0.0516	Veikt neikvætt -0.1818
Answer 10	-	Veikt jákvætt 0.0782	Veikt jákvætt 0.0753	Veikt neikvætt -0.0204	Veikt jákvætt 0.0247	Veikt jákvætt 0.0342	Veikt neikvætt -0.0131	Veikt neikvætt -0.1304
Answer 11	-	Veikt jákvætt 0.0578	Veikt jákvætt 0.0532	Veikt neikvætt -0.0096	Veikt jákvætt 0.0087	Veikt jákvætt 0.0195	Veikt jákvætt 0.0311	Veikt neikvætt -0.1196
Answer 12	-	Veikt jákvætt 0.0390	Veikt jákvætt 0.1037	Veikt neikvætt -0.0358	Veikt jákvætt 0.0358	Veikt jákvætt 0.0250	Veikt jákvætt 0.0299	Veikt neikvætt -0.1520
Answer 13	-	Veikt jákvætt 0.0644	Veikt jákvætt 0.1048	Veikt neikvætt -0.0448	Veikt jákvætt 0.0268	Veikt jákvætt 0.0417	Veikt jákvætt 0.0178	Veikt neikvætt -0.1600
Answer 14	-	Veikt jákvætt 0.0712	Veikt jákvætt 0.1021	Veikt neikvætt -0.0007	Veikt neikvætt -0.0088	Veikt neikvætt -0.0011	Veikt jákvætt 0.0088	Veikt neikvætt -0.1169
Answer 15	-	Veikt jákvætt 0.0557	Veikt jákvætt 0.1365	Veikt neikvætt -0.0423	Veikt jákvætt 0.0177	Veikt neikvætt -0.0162	Veikt jákvætt 0.0224	Veikt neikvætt -0.1179
Answer 16	-	Veikt jákvætt 0.0591	Veikt jákvætt 0.0273	Veikt neikvætt -0.0386	Veikt neikvætt -0.0400	Veikt jákvætt 0.0653	Veikt jákvætt 0.0284	Veikt neikvætt -0.0708

Flytja út í MS Excel

Þessi virkni verður í boði í eigin VUCA kannanir þínar

You can not only just create your poll in the gjaldskrá «V.U.C.A könnun hönnuður» (with a unique link and your logo) but also you can earn money by selling its results in the gjaldskrá «Skoðanakönnun», as already the authors of polls.

If you participated in VUCA polls, you can see your results and compare them with the overall polls results, which are constantly growing, in your personal account after purchasing gjaldskrá «My SDT»

[1] https://twitter.com/wileyprof

[2] https://colinallen.dnsalias.org

[3] https://philpeople.org/profiles/colin-allen

2023.10.13

Valerii Kosenko

Vörueigandinn SaaS Pet Project SDTEST®

Valerii var hæfur sem félagslegur kennslufræðingur árið 1993 og hefur síðan beitt þekkingu sinni í verkefnastjórnun.
Valerii náði meistaragráðu og hæfi verkefnis og dagskrárstjórans árið 2013. Meðan á meistaranámi sínu stóð kynntist hann Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft Für Projektmanagement e. V.) og Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii tók ýmis spíralvirknipróf og notaði þekkingu sína og reynslu til að laga núverandi útgáfu af SDTEST.
Valerii er höfundur þess að kanna óvissu V.U.C.A. Hugtak sem notar spíralvirkni og stærðfræðilega tölfræði í sálfræði, meira en 20 alþjóðlegar skoðanakannanir.

Þessi færsla hefur 0 Athugasemdir

Svara

Hætta við svar

Skildu athugasemd þína