AI Assistants Boost Beginners More Than Experts, Study Shows Correlation

There once was an AI named Chat who was really good at repeating back information it already knew. One day, Chat was given to some office workers [1] to help them with their jobs. Some of the workers were experts at their jobs, while others were still learning.  


At first, Chat helped all the workers get more work done faster - even the experts! But soon, the experts noticed something funny. The workers who were still learning got way MORE help from Chat. The new workers improved a lot using Chat, doing their work faster and better than ever before!   


The experts wondered why Chat didn't help them as much. That's when they realized - that Chat is an expert at repeating back facts but can't come up with brand new ideas. So, for workers who already knew those facts, Chat didn't offer them that much new help. But for newer workers still learning those basics, Chat was able to teach them so much more!


This shows a correlation - as in, two things that relate to each other and change together. The more expert a worker already was, the less helpful Chat was for them. But for newer workers, Chat could help them almost as much as the experts! It's because of their different starting points. Chat has a limit to how expert it can be. So, the closer a worker already was to Chat's expertise, the less new stuff Chat offered them.


The experts and newbies improved at different rates thanks to Chat. Their own expertise compared to Chat's matters for how much more they can learn. That connection in how much they improve is the correlation!


The SDTEST® gives clues to someone's motivational values. However, additional polls can provide more pieces of the puzzle.


Imagine also giving an "A.I. and the end of civilization" poll. It asks people to rate at the agree or disagree level. 


Now imagine 100 people who took both tests. You could match up each person's SDTEST® colors with their rated answers about the danger of AI.


Comparing tests gives an expanded picture of values in action. More puzzle pieces make the whole image more apparent!


Multiple tests can work together, like colors blending on a palette. Other polls reveal what engages your values, like what is the perception of the danger of AI. Combined, they paint a richer picture of what motivates our thoughts and deeds.


Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “A.I. and the end of civilization“. The full results of the poll are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


Dirbtinis intelektas ir civilizacijos pabaiga

Šalis
kalba
-
Mail
Perskaičiuoti
Kritinė reikšmė koreliacijos koeficientas
Normalus platinimas, pateikė William Sealy Gosset (studentas) r = 0.0723
Normalus platinimas, pateikė William Sealy Gosset (studentas) r = 0.0723
Ne normalus pasiskirstymas, autorius Spearman r = 0.0029
PaskirstymasNe
normalu
NormalusNe
normalu
NormalusNormalusNormalusNormalusNormalus
Visi klausimai
Visi klausimai
1) Saugumas (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
2) Kontrolė (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
1) Saugumas (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
Answer 1-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0643
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0187
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0956
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.1202
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0005
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0499
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0193
Answer 2-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0151
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0051
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0441
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0253
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0350
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0038
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0503
Answer 2-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0220
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0216
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0115
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0603
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0284
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0143
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0013
Answer 3-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0293
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0083
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0101
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0467
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0320
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0006
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0502
Answer 4-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0072
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0246
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0240
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0477
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0335
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0284
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0527
Answer 4-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0121
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0537
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0769
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0657
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0086
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0466
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0152
Answer 5-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0591
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0965
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0600
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0071
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0060
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0071
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0168
2) Kontrolė (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
Answer 6-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0132
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0035
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0801
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0543
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0260
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0781
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0439
Answer 7-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0242
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0234
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0420
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0280
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0824
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0099
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0551
Answer 7-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0165
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0378
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0547
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0176
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0019
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0566
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0289
Answer 8-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0146
Silpnas teigiamas
3.46E-5
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0290
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0583
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0296
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0094
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0558
Answer 9-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0069
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0343
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0508
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0414
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0658
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0075
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0442
Answer 9-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0955
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0364
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0180
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0054
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0261
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0732
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0073
Answer 10-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0035
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0867
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0352
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0661
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0264
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0137
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0689


Eksportas į MS Excel
Ši funkcija bus prieinama jūsų VUCA apklausose
Gerai



[1] https://www.ft.com/content/b2928076-5c52-43e9-8872-08fda2aa2fcf


2023.11.27
Valerii Kosenko
Produkto savininkas SaaS SDTEST®

1993 metais Valerii įgijo socialinio pedagogo-psichologo kvalifikaciją ir nuo tada savo žinias pritaikė projektų valdyme.
2013 m. Valerii įgijo magistro laipsnį ir projektų bei programų vadovo kvalifikaciją. Magistrantūros studijų metu susipažino su Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) ir Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii yra V.U.C.A. netikrumo tyrinėjimo autorius. koncepcija, naudojant spiralinę dinamiką ir matematinę statistiką psichologijoje, ir 38 tarptautinės apklausos.
Šis įrašas turi 0 Komentarai
Atsakinėti į
Atšaukti atsakymą
Palikite savo komentarą
×
Rasite klaidą
SIŪLYTI SAVO Teisingas versija
Įveskite savo e-mail kaip norim
Siųsti
atšaukti
Bot
sdtest
1
Sveiki! Leiskite paklausti tavęs, ar jūs jau susipažinote su spiralės dinamika?