آزمون بر اساس کتاب «Spiral Dynamics:
Mastering Values, Leadership, and
Change» (ISBN-13: 978-1405133562)
حامی

Psychological Analysis of Fear-Based Healthcare Messaging: Comparing HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Through the Lens of Spiral Dynamics

Dr. Tomás Campbell [1], a member of the BPS Division of Clinical Psychology Faculty for HIV and Sexual Health, article "Towards more inclusive and Empowering Healthcare Campaigns" [2] presents a compelling analysis of the evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging over four decades, tracing a path from fear-based approaches to more empowering, inclusive strategies. This progression reflects significant advances in both medical understanding and psychological approaches to public health communication. 

The SDTEST® survey data on fears provides an excellent opportunity to examine how these evolving messaging strategies align with contemporary fear psychology and value systems as described by Spiral Dynamics theory.


Comparative Analysis of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Fear Prevalence


The SDTEST® survey "Fears" involving 3,679 participants across 105 countries reveals that HIV/AIDS now ranks relatively low at 4%, while COVID-19 ranks even lower at just 2%. Below is a abridged version of the survey results. The full results are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


ترس

کشور
زبان
-
Mail
دوباره محاسبه کردن
مقدار بحرانی ضریب همبستگی
توزیع عادی ، توسط ویلیام سیلی گوست (دانشجو) r = 0.0315
توزیع عادی ، توسط ویلیام سیلی گوست (دانشجو) r = 0.0315
توزیع غیر عادی ، توسط Spearman r = 0.0013
توزیعغیر
عادی
غیر
عادی
غیر
عادی
طبیعیطبیعیطبیعیطبیعیطبیعی
تمام س questions الات
تمام س questions الات
بزرگترین ترس من این است
بزرگترین ترس من این است
Answer 1-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0545
مثبت ضعیف
0.0280
منفی ضعیف
-0.0193
مثبت ضعیف
0.0936
مثبت ضعیف
0.0389
منفی ضعیف
-0.0152
منفی ضعیف
-0.1564
Answer 2-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0195
منفی ضعیف
-0.0060
منفی ضعیف
-0.0384
مثبت ضعیف
0.0622
مثبت ضعیف
0.0495
مثبت ضعیف
0.0131
منفی ضعیف
-0.0966
Answer 3-
منفی ضعیف
-0.0001
منفی ضعیف
-0.0077
منفی ضعیف
-0.0463
منفی ضعیف
-0.0437
مثبت ضعیف
0.0496
مثبت ضعیف
0.0760
منفی ضعیف
-0.0234
Answer 4-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0440
مثبت ضعیف
0.0312
منفی ضعیف
-0.0258
مثبت ضعیف
0.0170
مثبت ضعیف
0.0371
مثبت ضعیف
0.0259
منفی ضعیف
-0.1031
Answer 5-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0268
مثبت ضعیف
0.1268
مثبت ضعیف
0.0106
مثبت ضعیف
0.0735
مثبت ضعیف
0.0013
منفی ضعیف
-0.0155
منفی ضعیف
-0.1768
Answer 6-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0003
مثبت ضعیف
0.0039
منفی ضعیف
-0.0619
منفی ضعیف
-0.0115
مثبت ضعیف
0.0265
مثبت ضعیف
0.0867
منفی ضعیف
-0.0363
Answer 7-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0125
مثبت ضعیف
0.0325
منفی ضعیف
-0.0674
منفی ضعیف
-0.0320
مثبت ضعیف
0.0536
مثبت ضعیف
0.0708
منفی ضعیف
-0.0530
Answer 8-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0657
مثبت ضعیف
0.0711
منفی ضعیف
-0.0277
مثبت ضعیف
0.0126
مثبت ضعیف
0.0393
مثبت ضعیف
0.0176
منفی ضعیف
-0.1347
Answer 9-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0764
مثبت ضعیف
0.1612
مثبت ضعیف
0.0046
مثبت ضعیف
0.0610
منفی ضعیف
-0.0067
منفی ضعیف
-0.0466
منفی ضعیف
-0.1831
Answer 10-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0771
مثبت ضعیف
0.0650
منفی ضعیف
-0.0135
مثبت ضعیف
0.0267
مثبت ضعیف
0.0359
منفی ضعیف
-0.0101
منفی ضعیف
-0.1346
Answer 11-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0629
مثبت ضعیف
0.0509
منفی ضعیف
-0.0077
مثبت ضعیف
0.0098
مثبت ضعیف
0.0266
مثبت ضعیف
0.0254
منفی ضعیف
-0.1269
Answer 12-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0440
مثبت ضعیف
0.0911
منفی ضعیف
-0.0328
مثبت ضعیف
0.0319
مثبت ضعیف
0.0356
مثبت ضعیف
0.0266
منفی ضعیف
-0.1530
Answer 13-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0722
مثبت ضعیف
0.0924
منفی ضعیف
-0.0383
مثبت ضعیف
0.0273
مثبت ضعیف
0.0442
مثبت ضعیف
0.0150
منفی ضعیف
-0.1631
Answer 14-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0818
مثبت ضعیف
0.0879
منفی ضعیف
-0.0052
منفی ضعیف
-0.0126
مثبت ضعیف
0.0072
مثبت ضعیف
0.0154
منفی ضعیف
-0.1206
Answer 15-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0556
مثبت ضعیف
0.1246
منفی ضعیف
-0.0348
مثبت ضعیف
0.0113
منفی ضعیف
-0.0140
مثبت ضعیف
0.0264
منفی ضعیف
-0.1162
Answer 16-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0727
مثبت ضعیف
0.0227
منفی ضعیف
-0.0384
منفی ضعیف
-0.0395
مثبت ضعیف
0.0741
مثبت ضعیف
0.0179
منفی ضعیف
-0.0772


صادرات به اکسل
این قابلیت در نظرسنجی های VUCA شما در دسترس خواهد بود
خوب

This modest fear prevalence contrasts sharply with the historical positioning of HIV/AIDS as a primary existential threat during the 1980s-90s. As the article aptly notes, early HIV/AIDS campaigns relied heavily on fear-based messaging, leveraging protection-motivation theory to drive behavioral change through graphic depictions of mortality and disease. The current survey results suggest these diseases have been partially normalized in the public consciousness, supporting the article's observation that medical advancements have transformed HIV from a death sentence to a manageable chronic condition.


When examining broader fear contexts, it's noteworthy that personal concerns about "illness of relatives and children" (11%) and general "illness" (8%) outrank specific disease fears like HIV/AIDS or COVID-19. This pattern indicates that abstract illness threats generate more anxiety than particular diseases that have been subject to extensive public education campaigns. This finding aligns with the article's discussion of how healthcare messaging has evolved toward destigmatization and normalization, particularly for HIV/AIDS.


Spiral Dynamics Correlations: Understanding Value Systems and Fear Responses


The correlation data between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provides fascinating insights into how different value systems engage with health threats. HIV/AIDS shows a positive correlation (0.0662) with Orange-level thinking, which represents achievement-oriented, strategic value systems. This alignment makes psychological sense, as Orange thinking prioritizes personal agency and risk management. Individuals operating from this value system may respond more actively to diseases perceived as consequences of personal behavior choices.


Conversely, HIV/AIDS fears correlate negatively with Yellow (-0.0516) and more strongly with Turquoise (-0.1776) value systems. These second-tier thinking systems in Spiral Dynamics represent more complex, integrative worldviews that may contextualize disease within a broader systemic understanding. The stronger negative correlation with Turquoise thinking is particularly notable, as this holistic perspective tends to integrate mortality and vulnerability into a comprehensive worldview, potentially reducing fear responses to specific conditions.


For COVID-19, the correlation pattern differs significantly. The positive correlation with Green thinking (0.0637) suggests that communitarian, egalitarian value systems may experience heightened concern about highly communicable diseases that threaten community well-being. This aligns with the article's discussion of how modern healthcare campaigns increasingly emphasize collective responsibility and community protection. The negative correlations with Blue (-0.0342), Orange (-0.0409), and Turquoise (-0.0748) value systems suggest varied psychological responses across the spiral.


Implications for Evolving Healthcare Messaging


The article chronicles a shift from fear-based campaigns toward empowerment and behavioral strategies, noting how psychological frameworks like self-efficacy theory and social norm theory have informed this evolution. The SDTEST® data supports the efficacy of this shift by demonstrating relatively low fear ratings for HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigma. This suggests that destigmatizing, empowering messaging approaches may have successfully normalized the condition in public consciousness.


The varying correlations between fears and Spiral Dynamics stages also validate the article's emphasis on intersectionality and tailored messaging. Different value systems appear to process disease threats through distinct psychological frameworks, which has significant implications for public health communication. The article notes that "campaigns are now much more carefully designed to address diverse populations," which aligns with the need to consider value system diversity in designing effective interventions.


Advancing Psychologically Informed Healthcare Communications


The relatively weak correlation between disease fears and specific Spiral Dynamics stages (with the critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0323) suggests that fears of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 transcend value systems but manifest differently within them. This finding supports the article's conclusion that messaging must "remain effective, compassionate, and mindful of nuance." The positive correlation between HIV/AIDS fears and Orange thinking, contrasted with COVID-19's positive correlation with Green thinking, demonstrates how different diseases activate different value concerns.


The article's discussion of digital and social media platforms as vectors for modern healthcare messaging presents opportunities for even more targeted value-specific communications. Understanding the psychological frameworks through which different Spiral Dynamics stages process health information could enable micro-targeted campaigns that resonate more effectively with diverse audiences. For instance, messaging aimed at Orange-dominant thinkers might emphasize personal agency and achievement in health management, while Green-focused messaging might highlight community protection and collective responsibility.


Conclusion


The evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging described in the article reflects a sophisticated understanding of psychological principles, moving from protection-motivation theory toward self-efficacy and social norm approaches. The SDTEST® data validates this progression by showing relatively modest contemporary fear responses to HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigmatization. The correlation patterns between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provide valuable insights for further refining healthcare communications to resonate with different value systems.


The comparative data between HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 fears, particularly their different correlation patterns with Spiral Dynamics stages, suggests that disease characteristics interact with value systems to produce distinct psychological responses. As the article argues, effective healthcare campaigns must continue to evolve based on evidence rather than prejudice. The SDTEST® data offers this evidence, demonstrating how fears of specific conditions correlate with different psychological frameworks and value systems.


This integration of fear psychology, mathematical correlation, and Spiral Dynamics theory provides a robust foundation for developing increasingly sophisticated, psychologically informed healthcare messaging strategies that can effectively engage diverse populations across the spiral of human development.



Sources

[1] https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomas-campbell-40202785/
[2] https://www.bps.org.uk/blog/towards-more-inclusive-and-empowering-healthcare-campaigns


2025.02.28
والری
مالک محصول SaaS SDTEST®

والری در سال 1993 به عنوان یک معلم اجتماعی-روانشناس صلاحیت یافت و از آن زمان دانش خود را در مدیریت پروژه به کار گرفته است.
والری در سال 2013 مدرک کارشناسی ارشد و صلاحیت مدیر پروژه و برنامه را دریافت کرد. در طول دوره کارشناسی ارشد خود، با Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) و Spiral Dynamics آشنا شد.
والری نویسنده کتاب بررسی عدم قطعیت V.U.C.A است. مفهوم با استفاده از دینامیک مارپیچی و آمار ریاضی در روانشناسی و 38 نظرسنجی بین المللی
این پست دارد 0 نظرات
پاسخ دادن به
پاسخ را لغو کنید
نظر خود را بگذارید
×
شما یک خطا
پیشنهاد نسخه صحیح خود را
ایمیل خود را به عنوان مورد نظر را وارد کنید
ارسال
لغو کردن
Bot
sdtest
1
سلام! بگذارید از شما بپرسم ، آیا قبلاً با دینامیک مارپیچ آشنا هستید؟