book-based test «Spiral Dynamics:
Mastering Values, Leadership, and
Change» (ISBN-13: 978-1405133562)
Sponsors

Psychological Analysis of Fear-Based Healthcare Messaging: Comparing HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Through the Lens of Spiral Dynamics

Dr. Tomás Campbell [1], a member of the BPS Division of Clinical Psychology Faculty for HIV and Sexual Health, article "Towards more inclusive and Empowering Healthcare Campaigns" [2] presents a compelling analysis of the evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging over four decades, tracing a path from fear-based approaches to more empowering, inclusive strategies. This progression reflects significant advances in both medical understanding and psychological approaches to public health communication. 

The SDTEST® survey data on fears provides an excellent opportunity to examine how these evolving messaging strategies align with contemporary fear psychology and value systems as described by Spiral Dynamics theory.


Comparative Analysis of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Fear Prevalence


The SDTEST® survey "Fears" involving 3,679 participants across 105 countries reveals that HIV/AIDS now ranks relatively low at 4%, while COVID-19 ranks even lower at just 2%. Below is a abridged version of the survey results. The full results are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


Fears

Country
Language
-
Mail
Recalculate
Critical value of the correlation coefficient
Normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0322
Normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0322
Non Normal distribution, by Spearman r = 0.0013
DistributionNon
Normal
Non
Normal
Non
Normal
NormalNormalNormalNormalNormal
All questions
All questions
My greatest fears are
My greatest fears are
Answer 1-
Weak positive
0.0508
Weak positive
0.0355
Weak negative
-0.0167
Weak positive
0.0937
Weak positive
0.0343
Weak negative
-0.0182
Weak negative
-0.1547
Answer 2-
Weak positive
0.0195
Weak positive
0.0014
Weak negative
-0.0408
Weak positive
0.0643
Weak positive
0.0458
Weak positive
0.0125
Weak negative
-0.0972
Answer 3-
Weak negative
-0.0015
Weak negative
-0.0086
Weak negative
-0.0466
Weak negative
-0.0457
Weak positive
0.0478
Weak positive
0.0753
Weak negative
-0.0172
Answer 4-
Weak positive
0.0408
Weak positive
0.0319
Weak negative
-0.0223
Weak positive
0.0188
Weak positive
0.0303
Weak positive
0.0224
Weak negative
-0.0966
Answer 5-
Weak positive
0.0298
Weak positive
0.1336
Weak positive
0.0088
Weak positive
0.0795
Weak negative
-1.99E-5
Weak negative
-0.0229
Weak negative
-0.1798
Answer 6-
Weak negative
-0.0034
Weak positive
0.0110
Weak negative
-0.0659
Weak negative
-0.0082
Weak positive
0.0211
Weak positive
0.0840
Weak negative
-0.0309
Answer 7-
Weak positive
0.0120
Weak positive
0.0425
Weak negative
-0.0709
Weak negative
-0.0286
Weak positive
0.0481
Weak positive
0.0654
Weak negative
-0.0499
Answer 8-
Weak positive
0.0640
Weak positive
0.0829
Weak negative
-0.0292
Weak positive
0.0153
Weak positive
0.0355
Weak positive
0.0130
Weak negative
-0.1349
Answer 9-
Weak positive
0.0682
Weak positive
0.1692
Weak positive
0.0047
Weak positive
0.0672
Weak negative
-0.0136
Weak negative
-0.0508
Weak negative
-0.1787
Answer 10-
Weak positive
0.0770
Weak positive
0.0734
Weak negative
-0.0207
Weak positive
0.0265
Weak positive
0.0318
Weak negative
-0.0106
Weak negative
-0.1292
Answer 11-
Weak positive
0.0622
Weak positive
0.0589
Weak negative
-0.0052
Weak positive
0.0085
Weak positive
0.0186
Weak positive
0.0236
Weak negative
-0.1234
Answer 12-
Weak positive
0.0425
Weak positive
0.1011
Weak negative
-0.0350
Weak positive
0.0358
Weak positive
0.0313
Weak positive
0.0237
Weak negative
-0.1534
Answer 13-
Weak positive
0.0681
Weak positive
0.1019
Weak negative
-0.0379
Weak positive
0.0274
Weak positive
0.0411
Weak positive
0.0139
Weak negative
-0.1626
Answer 14-
Weak positive
0.0726
Weak positive
0.0994
Weak negative
-0.0033
Weak negative
-0.0062
Weak positive
0.0029
Weak positive
0.0113
Weak negative
-0.1222
Answer 15-
Weak positive
0.0550
Weak positive
0.1342
Weak negative
-0.0341
Weak positive
0.0173
Weak negative
-0.0187
Weak positive
0.0206
Weak negative
-0.1187
Answer 16-
Weak positive
0.0668
Weak positive
0.0281
Weak negative
-0.0339
Weak negative
-0.0419
Weak positive
0.0660
Weak positive
0.0248
Weak negative
-0.0759


Export to MS Excel
This functionality will be available in your own VUCA polls
Ok

This modest fear prevalence contrasts sharply with the historical positioning of HIV/AIDS as a primary existential threat during the 1980s-90s. As the article aptly notes, early HIV/AIDS campaigns relied heavily on fear-based messaging, leveraging protection-motivation theory to drive behavioral change through graphic depictions of mortality and disease. The current survey results suggest these diseases have been partially normalized in the public consciousness, supporting the article's observation that medical advancements have transformed HIV from a death sentence to a manageable chronic condition.


When examining broader fear contexts, it's noteworthy that personal concerns about "illness of relatives and children" (11%) and general "illness" (8%) outrank specific disease fears like HIV/AIDS or COVID-19. This pattern indicates that abstract illness threats generate more anxiety than particular diseases that have been subject to extensive public education campaigns. This finding aligns with the article's discussion of how healthcare messaging has evolved toward destigmatization and normalization, particularly for HIV/AIDS.


Spiral Dynamics Correlations: Understanding Value Systems and Fear Responses


The correlation data between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provides fascinating insights into how different value systems engage with health threats. HIV/AIDS shows a positive correlation (0.0662) with Orange-level thinking, which represents achievement-oriented, strategic value systems. This alignment makes psychological sense, as Orange thinking prioritizes personal agency and risk management. Individuals operating from this value system may respond more actively to diseases perceived as consequences of personal behavior choices.


Conversely, HIV/AIDS fears correlate negatively with Yellow (-0.0516) and more strongly with Turquoise (-0.1776) value systems. These second-tier thinking systems in Spiral Dynamics represent more complex, integrative worldviews that may contextualize disease within a broader systemic understanding. The stronger negative correlation with Turquoise thinking is particularly notable, as this holistic perspective tends to integrate mortality and vulnerability into a comprehensive worldview, potentially reducing fear responses to specific conditions.


For COVID-19, the correlation pattern differs significantly. The positive correlation with Green thinking (0.0637) suggests that communitarian, egalitarian value systems may experience heightened concern about highly communicable diseases that threaten community well-being. This aligns with the article's discussion of how modern healthcare campaigns increasingly emphasize collective responsibility and community protection. The negative correlations with Blue (-0.0342), Orange (-0.0409), and Turquoise (-0.0748) value systems suggest varied psychological responses across the spiral.


Implications for Evolving Healthcare Messaging


The article chronicles a shift from fear-based campaigns toward empowerment and behavioral strategies, noting how psychological frameworks like self-efficacy theory and social norm theory have informed this evolution. The SDTEST® data supports the efficacy of this shift by demonstrating relatively low fear ratings for HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigma. This suggests that destigmatizing, empowering messaging approaches may have successfully normalized the condition in public consciousness.


The varying correlations between fears and Spiral Dynamics stages also validate the article's emphasis on intersectionality and tailored messaging. Different value systems appear to process disease threats through distinct psychological frameworks, which has significant implications for public health communication. The article notes that "campaigns are now much more carefully designed to address diverse populations," which aligns with the need to consider value system diversity in designing effective interventions.


Advancing Psychologically Informed Healthcare Communications


The relatively weak correlation between disease fears and specific Spiral Dynamics stages (with the critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0323) suggests that fears of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 transcend value systems but manifest differently within them. This finding supports the article's conclusion that messaging must "remain effective, compassionate, and mindful of nuance." The positive correlation between HIV/AIDS fears and Orange thinking, contrasted with COVID-19's positive correlation with Green thinking, demonstrates how different diseases activate different value concerns.


The article's discussion of digital and social media platforms as vectors for modern healthcare messaging presents opportunities for even more targeted value-specific communications. Understanding the psychological frameworks through which different Spiral Dynamics stages process health information could enable micro-targeted campaigns that resonate more effectively with diverse audiences. For instance, messaging aimed at Orange-dominant thinkers might emphasize personal agency and achievement in health management, while Green-focused messaging might highlight community protection and collective responsibility.


Conclusion


The evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging described in the article reflects a sophisticated understanding of psychological principles, moving from protection-motivation theory toward self-efficacy and social norm approaches. The SDTEST® data validates this progression by showing relatively modest contemporary fear responses to HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigmatization. The correlation patterns between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provide valuable insights for further refining healthcare communications to resonate with different value systems.


The comparative data between HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 fears, particularly their different correlation patterns with Spiral Dynamics stages, suggests that disease characteristics interact with value systems to produce distinct psychological responses. As the article argues, effective healthcare campaigns must continue to evolve based on evidence rather than prejudice. The SDTEST® data offers this evidence, demonstrating how fears of specific conditions correlate with different psychological frameworks and value systems.


This integration of fear psychology, mathematical correlation, and Spiral Dynamics theory provides a robust foundation for developing increasingly sophisticated, psychologically informed healthcare messaging strategies that can effectively engage diverse populations across the spiral of human development.



Sources

[1] https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomas-campbell-40202785/
[2] https://www.bps.org.uk/blog/towards-more-inclusive-and-empowering-healthcare-campaigns


2025.02.28
Valerii Kosenko
Product Owner SaaS SDTEST®

Valerii was qualified as a social pedagogue-psychologist in 1993 and has since applied his knowledge in project management.
Valerii obtained a Master's degree and the project and program manager qualification in 2013. During his Master's program, he became familiar with Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) and Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii is the author of exploring the uncertainty of the V.U.C.A. concept using Spiral Dynamics and mathematical statistics in psychology, and 38 international polls.
This Post has 0 Comments
Reply to
Cancel a reply
Leave your comment
×
YOU FIND AN ERROR
PROPOSE YOUR CORRECT VERSION
Enter your e-mail as desired
Send
Cancel
Bot
sdtest
1
Hi there! Let me ask you, do you already familiar with Spiral Dynamics?